Fu Zhenghao: Sika is the best second in the East. If you want to find a way to the Thunder, you must let him take more actions.

In the Eastern Conference Finals of the NBA Playoffs, the Pacers defeated the Knicks 125-108 and reached the Finals 4-2 with a big score. After the game, senior media person Fu Zhenghao posted a post on social media about the showdown.

Fu Zhenghao wrote: " #Sikam East Final MVP# As one of the best "second leaders" in the East, Sikam averaged 24.8 points, 5 rebounds, 3.5 assists per game in the Eastern Conference Finals, with a shooting percentage of 52.4% and a three-point shooting percentage of 50%. His performance was extremely stable and played the role of providing the team with the bottom line. Halliboton averaged 21 points, 6 rebounds, 10.5 assists per game, 45.5% of the field shooting percentage, and 32.7% of the three-point shooting percentage. Halliboton is undoubtedly the engine and number one core of this cyclone fast-paced team, but there is still room for evolution in the stability level. "

" In the end, in the media vote of the MVP of the Eastern Conference Finals, Sikam won 5 votes with a more stable performance, and Halliboton won 4 votes. The more stable and efficient second leader was finally crowned the MVP of the Eastern Conference Finals, and Sikam enjoyed Jaylen last year -Brown's treatment. This also shows that the Pacers play the ultimate team style, and the two guns lead the Pacers to stage a crazy fast-paced offensive. Some similarities are that the Pacers were able to advance to the finals 25 years ago, thanks to the ultimate team basketball style led by the two guns. The second instructor Jaylen Ross (average 18.2 points per game) beat the core Reggie Miller (average 18.1 points per game) to become the match The team's scoring champion in the season."

"It is worth mentioning that when facing the Pacers' double guns in the 2000 Finals, the Lakers gave Jaylen Ross (pictured below) greater defensive intensity, deliberately letting the older Reggie Miller shoot and break through. Miller made 16 shots in the first game of the finals and scored only 7 points. Although Miller averaged 24.3 points and 3.1 points per game in the entire series, he averaged 24.3 points and 3.1 points per game in the entire series. One rebound, 2.7 assists, but the shooting percentage is only 41.3%, while the second-in-command Ross averaged 23 points, 4.5 rebounds, 3 assists, and a shooting percentage of 46.7%. Both the Pacers won the game were that Ross got more ball rights and better play. "

" Of course, one of the reasons why Ross performed better in the finals G2 gave Kobe the opponent's footsteps, causing Kobe to leave the court due to injury (Kobe G2 played 8 minutes after injury, G3 was absent, and G4 played with injury to lead the team to win overtime with 2 points). Many years after retirement, Ross publicly admitted that he was intentional in the first place. He and Kobe were friends, but he really wanted to win. Of course, he had his own fixed points. Kobe scored 81 points on this old friend's head in 2006, and he played Jaylen Ross with every meeting. . "

"If the Pacers want to create greater challenges for the Thunder in the Finals, you might as well learn from the Pacers' last time in the Finals, that is, the tactics must be balanced, so that the second leader can take more actions and play more comfortably, and let the boss act as more bait to connect the entire team and play higher-level team basketball, so that they are expected to win. In this year's NBA Finals, the Thunder vs. the Pacers, the ratings and attention of the two small-market teams may not be as low as in previous years. In the impression that the NBA Finals had particularly low ratings in the past 20 years were the Spurs against the Pistons in 2005 and the Spurs swept the Cavaliers in 2007, which were all defensive battles for teams in the small-market teams. Although the Thunder and the Pacers are both small-market markets, at least their viewing of the offensive battle will be higher."